Katharina Hobgarski vs Verena Meliss Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jun at 09:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Hobgarski vs V. Meliss

GER
2
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hobgarski 2 - 0 Meliss
They have played 4 sets in total, with Katharina Hobgarski winning 4 and Verena Meliss winning 0. The last match between Katharina Hobgarski and Verena Meliss was at the W35 Klosters, 19-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Katharina Hobgarski getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hobgarski | 2 |
| Meliss | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Klosters(06-19-25)
(R2) Hammamet(09-22-16)
K. Hobgarski vs V. Meliss H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $39,739 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.14% (383-205) | Career Total W/L | 48.52% (246-261) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 19 | Titles | 2 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Hobgarski vs V. Meliss Match Preview:
- Analyzing second serve performance, Meliss has a stronger form, securing 39.75% of points on their second serve, compared to Hobgarski's 32.78%.
- In recent return game stats, both players have similar proficiency in winning points against their opponents' second serves, with Hobgarski at 48.7% and Meliss slightly higher at 48.86%.
- First serve return stats are nearly even, with Meliss holding a slight edge at 38.88% compared to Hobgarski's 38.57%.
- When dealing with breakpoints, Hobgarski appears to handle pressure better, saving 48.36% of breakpoints compared to Meliss's 46.05%.
- Overall match performance in the last year shows Hobgarski with a higher win rate of 67.14% versus Meliss's 50.94%.
- Surface performance favors Hobgarski on clay with a 67% win rate, while Meliss performs best on grass, also with a 67% success rate.
- Both players frequently compete at the Challengers/ITF level, but Hobgarski has a better win percentage here, 62% over Meliss's 40.63%.
- In their sole direct encounter, Hobgarski defeated Meliss decisively in straight sets on a clay surface.
- Considering opponent quality, Meliss has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 401.57 compared to Hobgarski’s 478.74.
- Meliss shows superior performance in deciding sets, winning 59% of such situations, while Hobgarski wins 41%.
- Hobgarski capitalizes better on breakpoint opportunities, converting 44.97% of chances, compared to Meliss's 40.59%.
Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the strengths of both players, Hobgarski demonstrates consistent overall match performance, holding a significant advantage in previous encounters. Their historical success on clay presents a clear edge in this matchup.
While Meliss shows commendable second serve efficiency and performs strongly in deciding set scenarios, the slightly better return game statistics and adaptability under pressure might not outweigh Hobgarski's competitive history against them.
Taking into account these factors and the head-to-head performance, Hobgarski is predicted to have the advantage and is the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Katharina Hobgarski vs Verena Meliss Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Hobgarski vs V. Meliss H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 11 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:14:55 | Average Match Time | 1:14:55 |
| 61% (56/92) | 1st Serve % | 62% (71/115) |
| 66% (37/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (37/71) |
| 53% (19/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (18/44) |
| 47% (9/19) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
| 52% (60/115) | Return Points Win % | 39% (36/92) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Hobgarski Recent Matches Played
V. Meliss Recent Matches Played

K. Hobgarski vs V. Meliss Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.14% (383/205) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.52% (246/261) |
| 62.09% (827/505) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.18% (570/589) |
| 54.65% (6515/5406) | Games Win/Loss | 50.24% (5335/5283) |
| 58.46% (38/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.55% (46/45) |
| 68.35% (311/144) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.89% (182/198) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.48% (16/17) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 323 | Aces Total | 781 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1789 | Total Double Faults | 1780 |
| 1:28:7 | Average Match Time | 1:23:58 |
| 542.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 495.39 |
| 67% (23051/34484) | 1st Serve % | 64% (17570/27570) |
| 58% (13307/23051) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (10645/17570) |
| 44% (5074/11432) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4313/10000) |
| 52% (2655/5093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1555/3293) |
| 50% (17599/35114) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12196/26945) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32.14% (9/19) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64.27% (250/139) | Challenger W/L | 44.19% (114/144) |
| 74.55% (123/42) | Futures W/L | 53.01% (132/117) |
| 66% (375/570) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (240/493) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 54% (55/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (58/113) |
| 60% (96/160) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (69/145) |
| 91% (348/315) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (246/201) |
| 9% (348/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (246/45) |
| 27% (240/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (261/46) |